PORQUÉ
JEFF SESSIONS AGUANTA TANTO CASTIGO?
Es
sorprendente que Jeff Sessions el Procurador o Fiscal General de los
EUA (designado por Trump), este´siendo humillado y reconvenido con
tanto venenoso rencor por el mismo POTUS a los inicios de su gestión.
Cómo es que no renuncia, muestra desagrado o se defiende. Le ha
dicho qué es débil, miedoso, cobarde, incompetente, que se
arrepiente de haberlo designado, pero no se atreve a despedirlo? Esta paradógica actuación (con Trump todo parece paradógico
absurdo o cuando menos raro), muy probablemente esconde motivaciones
tanto de Trump como de Sessions (que es un verdadero zorro de la
política). Tal parece que su agenda vá más allá de su labor como
US Attorney General. Porque al parecer él es más “trumpista” a
que el propio Donald. Pudiera ser que el vé más futuro en una
Administración Republicana de mayor extrema derecha que
el propio Trump por sus limitaciones intelectuales, impredecible
temperamento y patológica personalidad no vá a poder llevar a cabo?
Les
invito a leer el atinado artículo de David Leonhardt y de paso
revisar el video del inteligente Fiscal Especial Robert Mueller en el
link “lattest move in the russian probe”
|
|
David
Leonhardt
Op-Ed
Columnist New York Times
|
Jeff
Sessions has become a symbol of haplessness
and humiliation,
repeatedly undermined by his boss, the president. DBut
the image is at least partly misleading.
|
These
moves have come in a flurry over the past two weeks, the
same period in which Trump has so publicly soured on
Sessions for not blocking the Russia investigation. And
the moves are a reminder of why Sessions is enduring the
humiliation: He has a clear ideology, and he is willing to
endure some nasty words from President Trump in order to
enact it.
|
The
irony, of course, is that Sessions’s ideology is also
Trump’s. As Jeffrey Toobin writes in
The New Yorker, “no member of the Cabinet has worked
more assiduously to advance Trump’s agenda than
Sessions.” A recent piece by
Vox’s Dara Lind put it this way: “Sessions is the rare
Trump appointee more committed to Trumpism than he is to
Trump personally.”
|
The
Times Editorial Board has written on the contempt for
the rule of law that Trump’s attacks on Sessions show.
It also notes that
those attacks have begun to worry even the president’s
staunchest conservative allies.
|
But,
looking ahead, I’d encourage you to pay at least as much
attention to what Sessions’s Justice Department is doing
as you do to what the president is tweeting about
Sessions.
|
On
the news. Robert
Mueller’s latest
move in
the Russia probe is significant but not
surprising, explains Renato
Mariotti, a former federal prosecutor, in
Politico. “The existence of a grand jury confirms
what many of us presumed, which is that Mueller was
conducting a wide-ranging criminal investigation. What we
don’t know is what, if anything, they will uncover,”
he writes.
|
The
president negotiates poorly with foreign leaders in leaked
transcripts of
their conversations because narcissism blinds him to what
they want, Michelle Goldberg writes in
Slate. “Trump can’t make deals because he can’t see
other people clearly, can’t understand their desires,
incentives and constraints.”
|
But
even leaks that expose Trump’s unfitness set a dangerous
precedent, argues The
Atlantic’s David Frum. “Trump’s violation of basic
norms of government has driven people who would otherwise
uphold those norms unto death to violate them in their
turn,” he writes. “Contempt for Trump’s misconduct
inspires counter-misconduct.”
|
|
|
David
Leonhardt
Op-Ed
Columnist
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario